1 What is your nation's essential contingent authority?

The contingent expert in Portugal (AdC) appeared in 2003 and its present rules were endorsed by Decree-Law No. 125/2014. The AdC is a free authoritative substance, which is self-ruling in regard of its financing, organization and the board, and is depended with the authorization of the national contingent legitimate system, endorsed by Law No. 19/2012, and of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Division explicit controllers are not enabled to apply the contingent rules.

2 Does your opposition authority have investigatory force? Would it be able to bring criminal procedures dependent on rivalry infringement?

The AdC has very broad truth discovering powers. It can do investigations (sunrise assaults) at corporate premises, during which it might address corporate officials and representatives from whom it might demand reports or data; search, look at, duplicate and hold onto records (regardless of whether printed versions or advanced configuration), including messages and computer hard-drives; and close explicit rooms, zones, computers or servers. The AdC may likewise complete quests at the individual habitation of corporate chiefs, officials or workers, if it gets earlier legal authorisation. Moreover, the AdC may submit composed solicitations for data that the endeavors being referred to will undoubtedly reply, giving intensive and complete data. Inability to reply in full or the arrangement of mistaken or misdirecting data is culpable as a crime, and subject to fines of up to 1 percent of the endeavor's turnover. Something else, rivalry infringement don't establish wrongdoings under Portuguese law.

3 Can private antitrust cases continue corresponding to examinations and procedures brought by rivalry specialists and criminal investigators and advances from them?

Private antitrust cases can continue corresponding to examinations by the AdC, in spite of the fact that petitioners, especially in harms activities, may favor follow-on claims as a progressively powerful alternative. Independent cases face evidentiary obstacles because of troubles in acquiring access to pertinent data or reports contained in the define contingent
authority's record (in particular if the AdC has verified that its examination ought to stay under legitimate mystery pending an official conclusion or if the inquirer can't show that no other gathering is in a situation to supply the significant data or archives). Additionally, the accurate reason for the inquirer's reason for activity in the independent case might be influenced by, or rely upon, an official conclusion by the challenge authority.