Nietzsche opines that the society is in constant change. In his concrete philosophy which he backs up by evidence, he argues that most leaders fall out with the electorate because they fail to embrace change. In his view, static leaders loose connection with their voters the moment they become static. Change is the only constant thing throughout the generations. On the other hand, Dr. King disproves the criticism leveled against him in Birmingham stating that he was an outsider becoming to cause trouble in Birmingham. He first addresses that concern by telling that he is there through invitation. On the other hand, King argues that he has a moral obligation to fight against injustices all over the world. That is why he came to Birmingham.

Nietzsche addresses the problem of vulnerability in the society. He observes that men are naturally beasts who would take advantage of the disadvantaged at the slightest opportunity. When the strong beat down the vulnerable, it creates an anarchic society that makes it hard for a man to survive. He further observes that a man is nothing further than a beast. Whenever man is angered or filled with power, he tends to act based on his instincts. That is why people kill for power. The Sipo matador plant shows the quest of a man seeking increase in rank. This increases his strength and therefore his bargaining power. However, the society is aristocratic and always wants climbing towards the sun like the plant.

Dr. King condemns the treatment of the vulnerable groups in Alabama and intimates that they should be treated in a humane manner. Deriving his authority from the Holy book, the Bible, he argues that all men are equal before God. The unjust enrichment by the rich and impoverishing of the poor should be condemned. He argues against slavery as well. That is his basic idea of truth. On the other hand, the truth at times cannot be what we believe in; I think that truth is just exactly what people agree to.

Philosophically, truth is what can be justified or proved. In order for people to table evidence proving their facts, they are called upon to undertake research. That is the reason why philosophy is intertwined with scientific research. In fact, without research, philosophy would always remain toothless. In other words, research justifies objective knowledge. Dr. King’s approach is religion-based. Religious basis has no concrete evidence as a support and thus has no evidence except mere faith. Only the religious people are able to buy such an idea. On the other hand, Nietzsche clearly outlines the rot in the society and gives classic practical examples to the effect. These examples explain and illustrate the aristocracy in society. His illustration of the plant is clear about the ambition of every man to increase his power and strength.

In conclusion, the epistemology of philosophy simply denotes the science of philosophy itself. It tries to explain the root and justify philosophy. The nature of philosophy is always controversial but can only be understood through abstract concepts that are always difficult to comprehend on a flat basis. Nietzsche’s argument holds weight in the sense that it illustrates the current nature of society. People need to be deep thinkers in order to comprehend philosophy. Therefore, to understand the science and nature of philosophy itself, one needs to realize the its basics. Philosophy is independent, and no one shares views with another person. That is what makes philosophy the most intellectual concept in scholarly works.

The author of this article is a professional writer working at an educational website where you are able to buy essays online uk for which the highest grade is guaranteed.