FDA panel rejects ‘heat-not-burn’ cigarette safety claims

An U.S. advisory panel on Thursday rejected claims by Philip Morris International that a new smokeless cigarette it hopes to sell in the United States reduces the risk and harm of smoking.To get more news about Heat not burn, you can visit hitaste.net official website.

The panel, convened by the Food and Drug Administration, agreed with the company’s claim that its smokeless cigarette reduces smokers’ exposure to harmful chemicals but said the company had not proven conclusively that that would result in less actual harm and disease.The new technology, called IQOS, consists of a tube that gently heats up sticks of tobacco instead of burning them. By using heat instead of flame, Philip Morris claims, IQOS eradicates 90 to 95 percent of toxic compounds in cigarette smoke.

The cigarette has triggered debate and worries among health experts about whether IQOS will help or hurt public health in this country. Health advocates worry that such products could be used to attract new smokers and lure those trying to stop from quitting altogether.

IQOS represents a significant bet by Philip Morris to secure a strategic advantage as smoking in the United States drops to all-time lows. The company spent $3 billion to develop IQOS and other smokeless tobacco products and has already begun selling them in other countries.

The FDA is expected to decide on two key questions in coming months: Whether IQOS can be sold in the United States, and whether Philip Morris can market it as being less harmful.

If the FDA approves those health claims, IQOS would be the first tobacco product to carry the U.S. government’s stamp as a less harmful alternative to cigarettes – a potential marketing coup for Philip Morris.But the advisory panel’s findings puts a significant damper on that application. FDA often follows the panel’s recommendation, but does not have to.

“It was a two-edged response, recognition by the panel about the potential of the product but lack of evidence to support the health claims,” said Michael Eriksen, a former CDC official and tobacco expert at Georgia State University, who followed the hearing closely.

For the past two days, Eriksen had turned a conference room at his university into a watch party, streaming the panel’s hearings for students and fellow faculty. Many in the public health world still don’t know what to make of IQOS and are trying to figure out whether it could change the future landscape of smoking for better.

Complicating Philip Morris’ attempt to get IQOS approved for the U.S. marketplace is the fact that many of America’s leading health organizations and experts remain deeply suspicious of the company.This is the company, they have repeatedly pointed out, that makes Marlboro – the world’s best-selling cigarette – and misled the public for years about the hazards of smoking.

That skepticism and worry came through in many of the questions posed on Wednesday and Thursday by the advisory panel, which included leading public health experts and researchers.

Their key decisions hinged on the belief by many on the panel that Philip Morris hadn’t given them sufficient scientific proof that while IQOS appears to reduce exposure to harmful chemicals contained in tobacco, it is not clear it would reduce harm to smokers over time.