Surely you have already heard from this new MMO called New World. The title is currently on everyone s lips and thousands of players are already immersed in this new world. Many players have already reached a fairly high level and the various areas were claimed by guilds. Featured guilds can explain the war to the current rulers in order to make the area.

These wars are mostly very well organized, finally guilds receive some advantages due to stressed territories. The guild management decides who may participate in a war and strategies are already discussed in advance. However, there are currently a few problems. Numerous users on Reddit report that many war leaders and participants received a barrier on the day of the war. This is of course very unhappy and the loss of resources preprogrammed so to speak.

Furthermore, some players report that half of their complete guild received a barrier and also numerous individual players tell of unjustified barriers. Most of these locks do not really make sense and the answers of New World Customer Service (Buy Now 39.99 €) are not very meaningful. The community set the theory that a player automatically receives a spell when he is reported too often in the game.

A member of the Customer Service called Moderator z confirmed this theory in a post office in the official New World forums. According to him, BOTS players can banish automatically if they are reported within a short period of a large number of players. In addition, Moderator Z assured that the developers are currently working on a better solution.

Players are visually frustrated by this mechanics. This can be exploited to clear the members of an enemy guild out of the way to tear their area under the nail. However, the view of a better mechanics gave some players at least a little hope.

But Amazon is probably not sure if there are these automated banns. Recently, the community manager NW-Mugsy explained namely in another forum post that the statements of moderator z do not meet the truth:

I would like to apologize for moderator z, I m not sure why he believes we use bots to moderate, but we will examine that. We use EAC for people who have been found to cheat. Maybe was moderator z Confused about the differences between EAC and the way, as conduct code reports are processed in the game. I will work with him and his team to ensure that they do not provide contradictory information in the future.

This would not be the first time that misinterrupts were spread from Amazon. For example, the company recently explained that there will be no cross-regional server transfers, even though they explicitly announced them.

If there are no automated locks, then the question remains open why so many influential guild members will be blocked within a very short time and that even shortly before important events like a war. According to MW-Mugsy, these players really have violated all against the Code of Conduct and therefore received a justified barrier. If you want to give moderator z faith, this simply happened by mass reports of enemy guilds and players. The latter would probably give a little more meaning.

Until this situation is clarified, players would rather not use the chat function of the game. This allows potential mass reports to be significantly easier to pass. Or you should stick to the Code of Conduct. Who knows how these mass locks really come about. Amazon at least probably not.

From Daniel Link author 10.10.2021 at 18:58

Related Articles

• Mmo called new world: A new MMO started on Steam. It is called Eden: New Dawn
• Players: Tales of Arise starts strong in Steam; You already have more player...
• World customer service: Diablo 2 resurrected: Players complain about server problems, maint...
• World: NEW WORLD: The three fractions