Annually brings wish for dca cancer cure towards the media forefront which year started with a bang. An ingredient that was used in a metabolic disorder was tested on cultured human cancer cell lines in a Petri dish and mice with cancer together very promising results.

The aforementioned paragraph has probably been stated every year for the past Thirty years. First of all, do not expect your medical professional to be prescribing this product anytime soon, a single experiment with mice is simply the beginning of many years of testing. Anybody who suggests it will help you soon is irresponsible or perhaps a con artist.

Unfortunately terminally ill cancer patients don't possess this time and you will be getting their hopes up in vain, this occurs every year when cancer research causes it to be to the mainstream news programs.



The substance is DCA or dichloroacetate as well as the study that tested it in cultured cancer cells and mice just came out in January of 2007 in the respectable scientific journal and also by a respectable lab in Alberta, Canada headed by Evangelos D. Michelakis.

So why all the fuss ? It's years away from helping humans even just in the best case scenario? Yes, probably, but it does raise several ethical debates and hopeful issues.

DCA was already tested in people experiencing other diseases (adults and children), so we know it is a reasonably safe drug to a point. This can potentially save many years of clinical studies and safety hurdles than if DCA would be a completely new drug. So very optimistically within one or two years it's going to begin limited clinical studies within people.

This is optimistic because cash is an issue with this particular drug. The medication is so cheap to produce that drug companies will not earn money from it (it cannot be patented too, which makes it harder for drug companies to generate money) and it has the potential to reduce the consumption of current expensive chemotherapies if successful. Quite simply, the drug companies not be funding the research to make it to promote, and most of you can probably estimate that it takes a ba-zillion dollars to finance the research. This raises a moral debate for drug companies through the public, that being, would they hinder progression of helpful drugs if it does not help as well as hinder their bottom line?

This drug also raises another ethical question . Why not give it to cancer patients clinically determined to have a few months to call home? There are potentially thousands of patients who have gone through chemotherapy and reached the stage where chemotherapy is not useful and they're taken off it to die weeks later. There would be a huge amount of people ready to sign a waiver to adopt DCA today.

How do a doctor tell a crictally ill cancer patient by incorporating weeks or months to reside that they will not prescribe DCA because it's potentially unsafe or lacks the right administrative approval or was not shown to conclusively assist in enough formal studies?

Well, most doctors won't claim that but they will say their hospital or governing medical association won't let them. These faceless administrations can hide and delay your requests for DCA until you die of later years, let alone cancer with no one will be blamed.

Essentially they may be telling patients to stop fighting cancer and simply accept their death shortly, sorry, it's a cold method to put it, however it is hard to place a good spin about it. It's not that the doctors usually do not care, it is just the accepted way things have been done for decades.

Unfortunately, currently terminal ill cancer patients removed from chemotherapy for them to die using some months must rely on themselves, loved ones and caretakers at this time.

This is now forcing many non-healthcare workers to search out DCA on their own. Stuffed to see untrained civilians taking over cancer therapy duties but it's going to happen with this particular drug as they can be taken orally in a glass water and is inexpensive If you achieve your hands on it. You can't buy it on the corner store however i predict with great demand it will find a way to decide to some con artist will even make fake DCA to sell them without doubt.

Who would of thought a little molecule might have raised debates in regards to the business of healthcare, political healthcare administrations as well as the ethical management of terminally ill people.