About 500 BCE King Xerxes ruled around an enormous Persian empire extending from Egypt to India. Early in his reign he arranged a seven day semi-drunken food for guys to enjoy his glory and power. His partner, Double Vashti, conducted a separate food for women. On the seventh time of the food, high on wine, he delivered eight eunuchs to escort the double to his party so the men can see how wonderful she was. He focused her to use her crown, but it's unclear if he wanted her to wear any such thing else.Numerous experts believe she was estimated to seem naked. Lots of the guys had probably currently considered her fully clad and would doubtless have loved an even more exposing photograph of her beauty. In any case Vashti refused to go.

Following counselling together with his clever men Xerxes ignored her as queen. Then had the issue of obtaining still another king - and wife. His particular attendants recommended he conduct a beauty contest involving the absolute most appealing small virgins to find out who ought to be queen. The master easily recognized that advice. He appointed commissioners in all the 127 provinces of his empire to locate wonderful virgin women to send to the capital city, Shushan, for assessment. Area of the examination method expected each virgin to pay a night with the king. It would have been an arduous job for the king because, based on Josephus, 400 virgins were sent in from the provinces. That story, along in what followed, is reported also in the biblical book named Esther.

Ultimately the master selected an obvious success and, exceptionally, she turned out to become a Jewish lady named Esther who had been "wonderful in type and features" ;.(2:7 NIV)Before going further we may wish to reflect on the moral fibre of those two queens. It appears to be that the Persian Queen Vashti was going for a stand on theory and was treated really harshly because of it while Esther, as a Jewish lady, appeared to possess number qualms about sex with the king. It absolutely was, needless to say, merely a matter of singles' intercourse because the king had divorced Vashti.The penalty for adultery in Israel was demise, but how about singles' sex? One biblical passage (Exodus 22:16,17) suggests that the penalty for singles' sex was that the errant pair had to marry, provided dad allowed, and the man had to pay for the bride price.

Hence the attachment of the penis into the vagina constituted a marriage proposal and the girl was assumed to have accepted the proposal unless she screamed fully as in a rape case. (Deuteronomy 22:25-28) If father didn't permit the union the man however had to pay the bride price because his child, as a non-virgin today, had been devalued in the marketplace. This alone will give the man some cause for restraint in pursuing his sexual activities. Brickell Heights West

There is also a chance the lady could develop into a simple mom as a result of the sexual relationship proposal but possibly the daddy, having forbidden the marriage, could experience some duty to aid the mother and child.We would, needless to say,see these provisions as really primitive and rather unacceptable; however it is useful to remember that there could be nowhere near as numerous simple parents, much less sexually given infection, and probably fewer divorces underneath the Jewish process because father (whose boring perceptions might absolutely have already been enlivened by mum) may identify probable future problems and ban an unsuitable marriage.