Yet, despite mounting written reports and recommendations by experts over the decades, the desire to age in place is barely, if at all, reflected in our policies and actions. Calls to fund a broader spectrum of health and social services that will allow Canadian seniors to age at home have been regularly overlooked by successive governments. In 2021, even after a year-and-a-half of heartbreaking stories about the suffering of our oldest and most vulnerable citizens in long-term care homes, the conversation remains fixated on institutional settings as seemingly the only option for aging Canadians.

Aging in place is when an aging individual stays in their own home, community, or other familiar setting to live out the end of their life. The idea is that older individuals are able to age in place if they can still live independently or with minimal assistance. The term also refers to the belief that certain neighborhoods and communities may be more conducive to aging-in-place than others.

It is a common misconception that a person can only age in place if they use assisted living facilities or healthcare services. In reality, it is possible for a person to age in place without using any assisted living facilities or healthcare services. It is possible for a person to stay in their own home and remain healthy and independent by receiving care from family members, friends, and people from the community that live nearby.

Aging in place is SonderCare - homecare supplies a phrase used to describe the decision of an aging individual to not move from their residence, even if their physical or mental ability has deteriorated. The phrase suggests that the person wants to age and live independently in the home they have spent their life building.

The term can also refer to an individual’s goal of retaining complete http://edition.cnn.com/search/?text=hospital beds independence and autonomy as they age. The phrase is often used by people who work with seniors and those who offer senior living communities.